- Academia+Université Activism-Militantisme Animal Anthropologist+Anthropologue Argentina Art Australia Body+Corps Branding+Marques China Claude Lévi-Strauss Consumer+Consommation Czech+Tchèque Death+Mort Design Ethics+Déontologie Family+Famille Food+Alimentation France Gender+Genre Germany+Allemagne Globalisation Globalisation+Mondialisation Health+Santé Hello+Bonjour History+Histoire Identity+Identité Internet Iran Italy Japan Language+Langage Literature Love+Amour Madagascar Material Culture+Culture matérielle Media+Média Mind+Esprit Museum Museum+Musée Music+Musique Nationalism Nature Nicaragua Pierre Bourdieu Politics+Politique Polynesia Power+Pouvoir Racism+Racisme Religion Ritual+Rituel Rural Russia Sarajevo Skateboard Social Theory+Théorie sociale Sport Street Street+Rue Sweden+Suède Transport UK Video+Vidéo Visual+Visuel Voices+Voix War+Guerre Work+Travail
Tag Archives: Internet
+ + Sarah + + The following lines are experts from a hilarious discussion thread titled Anthropology Pick Up Lines. The entire discussion can be accessed in a Facebook group that goes by the killer name of Anthropology + Good … Continue reading
Warning: I am about to make rather controversial use of anthropology to better contextualise Pro-Ana – otherwise short for ‘Promote-Anorexia’ – the movement that safeguards anorexia as a lifestyle. [And no, before questions arise, I do not suffer an eating disorder, nor am I pro-Ana – rather pro-listening].
Pro-Ana’s social and psychological online support for anorexia sufferers is clearly well-meant. But it still appears somewhat contradictory in light of the plethora of lifestyle tips on how to become dangerously thin which it also encourages online. Hence the general argument against Pro-Ana websites is that: not only do they provide a space for harmful collective narratives that otherwise prolong the condition in pre-existing sufferers, but that they also encourage its development in non-sufferers. According to contemporary western biomedicine, anorexia must strictly not be viewed as a lifestyle, but as a seriously deadly disorder that is infamously difficult to treat, with the highest mortality rates of any psychiatric illness. But which comes first – the biological aetiology of the disease, or the cultural norms also influencing its onset? Has anorexia always been perceived as a dangerous, medicalised psychopathology in ages past? And can it ever be viewed culturally rather than medically i.e. as a lifestyle providing alternative cultural narratives for coping with social pressure as well as illness in modern times? Continue reading